It is fresh in memory that unjust receipt
of public assistance became a problem recently. Then, a theme called the
breakdown of social security of Japan was often treated.
Source-of-Revenue Pressure of Social Security
Cost
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3772/b377251e93b9a67d78992a6ec73cc8711f785988" alt=""
The total amount of the social security
cost in 2012 is 26 trillion yen. This is equivalent to 52% of general
expenditures of Japan. Furthermore, this is equal to the total revenue amount
of an income tax, a corporation tax, and a consumption tax, i.e., the three
major taxes. Moreover, this expense increases about 1 trillion yen respectively
every year. It is used for social security cost mainly maintaining
indispensable public services, such as welfare allowances, a pension, medical
expenses, and care welfare expenses. And this problem is deeply concerned with
a low-birthrate-and-longevity problem, an issue of increasing the consumption
tax, etc.
The problem of public assistance
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a25e/0a25e7415a1003e919fe9f1cc2a9c832fc971ccb" alt=""
Welfare allowances are often made a victim
noting that it is comparatively reducible. This is about 4 trillion yen in
total, and is small compared with other expenses, such as medical expenses (30
trillion) and a pension (50 trillion). It is because the fact that this expense
is still discussed for the problem of unjust receipt and really required person
cannot be offering sufficient support. 25,000 affairs will become clear about
unjust receipt in 2010, and it will be said that the total amount exceeds
12,800 million yen. And, 2,110,000 people's unjust receipt became clear in 2012
more. Although there is an example like this, it has not resulted, since it
turns out that the police does not often charge or the gang is concerned in the
back. On the other hand, the rate that welfare allowances occupy in a national
budget of Japan is low. Japan is 0.3% so much in the United States (3.7%),
Britain (4.1%), and Germany (2.0%). And it is also a fact that there are those
who are in pain without the ability to actually lead a minimum life. Thus, both
to increase about welfare allowances and to reduce are required.
Maintenance of a
pension system
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05709/05709d35f1e163dc73955a839bed9f8283b8115f" alt=""
The pension of Japan serves as the simple
system that the generation's young man supports elderly people. Therefore, at
the present aged society, this system consumes financial funds in the amount of
money as the several times of income. A pension system is a system materialized
at the time when man's life expectancy is shorter than now, and the amount of
money paid is even now computed in a formula of those days. For example, when
it was around 1980, one old man was supported by 7 to 8 persons. However, you have to support one old man by
3 to 4 young men now. The burden rate is formed into 2 twice compared with
about 30-year before. The burden rate per young man continues to increase.
Thus, the structure of the pension system itself has unreasonableness. In this
situation, it is certain that the increase in raising of pension eligibility
age, a substantial reduction of pension obligation fees, and the working
population's pension obligation fees is someday performed. However, if this is
performed, a great burden will be applied to a young man, or it will interfere
with elderly people's life. So, the pension system is holding complicated
dilemma now.
No comments:
Post a Comment